Liberty Street Economics

« | Main | »

May 13, 2024

Who Is Borrowing and Lending in the Eurodollar and Selected Deposit Markets?

A recent Liberty Street Economics post discussed who is borrowing and lending in the federal funds (fed funds) market. This post explores activity in two other markets for short-term bank liabilities that are often perceived as close substitutes for fed funds—the markets for Eurodollars and “selected deposits.” 

The Eurodollar and Selected Deposits Markets 

Eurodollars are unsecured U.S. dollar deposits that are booked at bank offices outside of the United States. A central function of Eurodollars is that they can be used by banks to meet their dollar funding needs. U.S.-based banks—U.S. depository institutions or U.S. branches and agencies of foreign banks—can accept Eurodollars, typically with an overnight maturity, in offshore branches and then transfer the funds onshore. Selected deposits are unsecured U.S. dollar deposits that also tend to have an overnight maturity, similar to Eurodollars. However, unlike Eurodollars, but like fed funds, selected deposits are booked at bank offices in the U.S.  

Historically, Eurodollars and selected deposits have played a role similar to fed funds as a source of short-term wholesale unsecured funding for banks, but there have been differences in how regulation has treated these dollar deposits. For instance, fed funds were historically exempt from reserve requirements; Eurodollars also became exempt in 1990. It was only in 2020 that selected deposits became exempt, when the Federal Reserve eliminated all requirements to hold reserves against certain types of deposits and other bank liabilities, including selected deposits. Additionally, prior to the repeal of Regulation Q in 2011, banks were not permitted to pay interest on demand deposits, including selected deposits.  

The Federal Reserve collects data on the Eurodollar and selected deposit transactions of U.S.-based banks. As shown in the chart below, since 2019, the daily volume of overnight Eurodollar and selected deposit transactions has averaged $150 billion, compared to $80 billion for overnight fed funds. Over this period, the composition of Eurodollars and selected deposits has shifted notably. In 2019, Eurodollars and selected deposits each accounted for roughly half of their combined overnight volume, but since 2022 selected deposits have accounted for 85 percent of total volume.  

There are a number of potential reasons for this shift toward selected deposits. For example, as discussed in this post, the introduction of resolution plans or living wills, as part of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, created an incentive for banks to simplify corporate structures, including by eliminating offshore branches where banks accept Eurodollars. Second, prior to the elimination of reserve requirements in 2020, the need to hold reserves against selected deposits—but not Eurodollars—may have slowed the growth in selected deposits. The timing of this elimination coincides with the increase in selected deposit volumes in late 2020. That said, it is important to note that given the level of reserves in the U.S. banking system since the Great Financial Crisis, this cost differential between selected deposits and fed funds/Eurodollars had narrowed prior to 2020, as required reserves became a smaller fraction of total reserves in the U.S. banking system.  

The Shift from Eurodollars to Selected Deposits  

Sources: Federal Reserve Form FR 2420, Report of Selected Money Market Rates; authors’ calculations.  
Note: The chart shows quarterly average Eurodollar, fed funds, and selected deposit volume as included in the Overnight Bank Funding Rate from the 2015:Q4 through 2024:Q1. The selected deposit series begins in 2019:Q2. 

Who’s Borrowing?  

The main borrowers of Eurodollars and selected deposits are the U.S. branches and agencies of foreign banks (FBO branches). On an average day, FBO branches borrow between $50 billion and $200 billion, accounting for over 90 percent of total daily volume since 2016. As we discussed in an earlier post, FBO branches are also the main borrowers in the fed funds market, with a market share ranging between 65 and 95 percent of the total daily volume.   

 FBO Branches Are the Main Borrowers of Eurodollars and Selected Deposits  

Sources: Federal Reserve Form FR 2420, Report of Selected Money Market Rates; authors’ calculations.  
Note: The chart shows quarterly average Eurodollar and selected deposit volume by borrower type as included in the Overnight Bank Funding Rate from 2015:Q4 through 2024:Q1. Vertical dashed line corresponds to the beginning of the selected deposit series (2019:Q2). 

While FBO branches engage in banking activities similar to those of domestic banks, deposits at FBO branches—with a small number of exceptions—are not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). This implies that these FBO branches cannot accept retail deposits, limiting their sources of stable funding and making them reliant on wholesale funding, like Eurodollars and selected deposits. Moreover, since they do not pay the FDIC deposit insurance assessment fee, most FBO branches face a lower effective cost of borrowing, which gives them a comparative advantage relative to insured institutions when borrowing in wholesale funding markets.  

Who’s Lending?   

The main lenders in Eurodollars and selected deposits are non-depository institutions that primarily engage in financial intermediation services such as brokerage, underwriting, credit origination, credit card, insurance, and pension services, among others. As the following chart shows, these financial institutions represent 80 percent of the volume lent in the overnight Eurodollar and selected deposit markets.   

Non-depository Financial Institutions Are the Main Lenders of Eurodollars and Selected Deposits  

Sources: Federal Reserve Form FR 2420, Report of Selected Money Market Rates; authors’ calculations.  
Note: The chart shows quarterly average Eurodollar and selected deposit volume by lender type as included in the Overnight Bank Funding Rate from 2015:Q4 through 2024:Q1. Vertical dashed line corresponds to the beginning of the selected deposit series (2019:Q2).  

The type of lender is an important feature that distinguishes Eurodollars and selected deposits from fed funds transactions. As we discussed in our earlier post, Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLBs)—government-sponsored enterprises that support mortgage lending and community investments—dominate lending in the fed funds market, accounting for over 90 percent of the total daily volume traded. The Eurodollar and selected deposit markets offer a broader set of lenders. However, borrowing from FHLBs has a favorable treatment in banks’ calculation of outflows for their Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR), potentially making fed funds more attractive than Eurodollars and selected deposits (as explained in this article). Consistent with the existence of this regulatory advantage, the chart below shows that banks typically pay higher rates to borrow in the fed funds market relative to Eurodollars and selected deposits.   

Higher Rates in the Federal Funds Market than in Eurodollars and Selected Deposits  

Sources: Federal Reserve Form FR 2420, Report of Selected Money Market Rates; authors’ calculations.  
Note: The chart shows the spread between the volume-weighted mean interest rate and the Fed’s interest rate on reserve balances from 2015:Q4 through 2024:Q1. Vertical dashed line corresponds to the beginning of the selected deposit series (2019:Q2).  

In Sum  

Changes in regulation and in the economic conditions in the U.S. banking system since the Great Financial Crisis have contributed to the narrowing of the differences between Eurodollars, selected deposits, and fed funds, with selected deposits trading overtaking the Eurodollar market in recent years. Given their lower costs of borrowing, FBO branches are the main borrowers in all these markets. The set of lenders, however, is considerably larger for Eurodollars and selected deposits. The regulatory advantage of fed funds still makes them relatively more attractive, which is reflected in the higher rates at which they trade.  

Photo: portrait of Gara Afonso

Gara Afonso is the head of Banking Studies in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.

Photo: portrait of Gonzalo Cisternas

Gonzalo Cisternas is a financial research advisor in Non-Bank Financial Institution Studies in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.  

Will Riordan is a capital markets trading advisor in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Markets Group.

How to cite this post:
Gara Afonso, Gonzalo Cisternas, and Will Riordan  , “Who Is Borrowing and Lending in the Eurodollar and Selected Deposit Markets?,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Liberty Street Economics, May 13, 2024, https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2024/05/who-is-borrowing-and-lending-in-the-eurodollar-and-selected-deposit-markets/.


Disclaimer
The views expressed in this post are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the author(s).

About the Blog

Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.

The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Asani Sarkar, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.

Liberty Street Economics does not publish new posts during the blackout periods surrounding Federal Open Market Committee meetings.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.

Economic Research Tracker

Image of NYFED Economic Research Tracker Icon Liberty Street Economics is available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.

Economic Inequality

image of inequality icons for the Economic Inequality: A Research Series

This ongoing Liberty Street Economics series analyzes disparities in economic and policy outcomes by race, gender, age, region, income, and other factors.

Most Read this Year

Comment Guidelines

 

We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:

Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1,500 characters.

Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.

Please be relevant: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post.

Please be respectful: We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will
not be posted.‎

Comments with links: Please do not include any links in your comment, even if you feel the links will contribute to the discussion. Comments with links will not be posted.

Send Us Feedback

Disclosure Policy

The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.

Archives