The FRBNY DSGE Model Forecast—February 2017   Liberty Street Economics
Liberty Street Economics

« Just Released: Total Household Debt Nears 2008 Peak but Debt Picture Looks Much Different | Main | A Close Look at the Decline of Homeownership »

February 17, 2017

The FRBNY DSGE Model Forecast—February 2017



This post presents the latest update of the economic forecasts generated by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s (FRBNY) dynamic stochastic general equilibrium (DSGE) model. We introduced this model in a series of blog posts in September 2014 and published forecasts twice a year thereafter. With this post, we move to a quarterly release schedule, and highlight how our forecasts have changed since November 2016.

Readers should keep in mind that the DSGE model forecast is not an official New York Fed forecast, but only an input to the Research staff’s overall forecasting process. For more information about the model and the variables discussed here, see our DSGE Model Q & A.

The table and charts below show the February model forecasts for 2017-20 alongside the forecasts produced in November 2016. The February projections use quarterly macroeconomic data released through the fourth quarter of 2016 and available financial data through the first quarter of 2017 (as of January 30, 2017).


The FRBNY DSGE Model Forecast—February 2017


How do the latest forecasts compare with the November forecasts?

  • The current GDP growth forecast is somewhat stronger than its November counterpart in the short run (as one can see from the quarter-to-quarter comparison in the right panel of the chart below), mainly because the financial market spread between Baa corporate and Treasury securities narrowed since the elections. Nevertheless, the growth forecast is roughly unchanged on a year-over-year basis for 2017, as well as in the medium and longer run.
  • The current forecast for core PCE (personal consumption expenditures) inflation is slightly higher than in November in spite of the low core inflation numbers for the fourth quarter of 2016, as wages are expected to grow at a firmer pace than in November and the output gap is projected to narrow at a somewhat faster pace. The modal forecast for core PCE inflation remains below the 2 percent Federal Open Market Committee long-run inflation objective.
  • The uncertainty around the output growth and inflation forecasts is substantial, as the shaded areas in the charts make clear.


The FRBNY DSGE Model Forecast—February 2017


LSE_2017_dsge-Q1_delnegro_ch2_art


One reason for the moderate inflation forecast is that the level of real output is still forecast to remain below its potential over the next few years, as seen in the chart below. The uncertainty around the output gap forecasts is, however, very large.


The FRBNY DSGE Model Forecast—February 2017


The last variable we forecast is the real natural rate of interest—the real interest rate that would prevail in the economy were there no nominal rigidities or markup shocks (see the chart below). This variable can be understood as an estimate of where the real interest rate would be in the absence of monetary policy: that is, it summarizes the contribution that economic factors other than monetary policy make to interest rates.


The FRBNY DSGE Model Forecast—February 2017


The estimate of the real natural rate of interest has increased significantly since 2014, reflecting improving economic conditions, and its forecast has been revised up slightly since November. Going forward, the natural rate of interest is projected to continue to increase, albeit at a slower pace.

Disclaimer
The views expressed in this post are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors.





Marco Del Negro Marco Del Negro is a vice president in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.

Marc Giannoni Marc Giannoni is an assistant vice president in the Group.


Abhi GuptaAbhi Gupta is a senior research analyst in the Group.


Pearl LiPearl Li is a senior research analyst in the Group.


Erica Moszkowski Erica Moszkowski is a senior research analyst in the Group.



How to cite this blog post:
Marco del Negro, Marc Giannoni, Abhi Gupta, Pearl Li, and Erica Moszkowski, “The FRBNY DSGE Model Forecast—February 2017,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Liberty Street Economics (blog), February 17, 2017, http://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2016/11/the-frbny-dsge-model-forecastfebruary-2017.
Posted by Blog Author at 07:00:00 AM in Forecasting, Macroecon, Monetary Policy
Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

The comments to this entry are closed.

About the Blog
Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from economists working at the intersection of research and policy. The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Donald Morgan.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.


Economic Research Tracker

Liberty Street Economics is now available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.


Useful Links
Comment Guidelines
We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:
Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1500 characters.
Please be quick: Comments submitted after COB on Friday will not be published until Monday morning.
Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.
Please be on-topic and patient: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post. We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will not be posted.‎
Disclosure Policy
The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.
Archives