Consumers Expect Modest Increase in Spending Growth and Continued Government Support -Liberty Street Economics
Liberty Street Economics

« COVID-19 and the Search for Digital Alternatives to Cash | Main | The New York Fed DSGE Model Forecast—September 2020 »

September 28, 2020

Consumers Expect Modest Increase in Spending Growth and Continued Government Support



LSE_2020_sce-jr-spending-policy_vanderklaauw_460

The New York Fed’s Center for Microeconomic Data released results today from its August 2020 SCE Household Spending Survey and SCE Public Policy Survey. The former provides information on consumers' experiences and expectations regarding household spending, while the latter provides information on consumers' expectations regarding future changes for a wide range of fiscal and social policies and the potential impact of these changes on their households. These data have been collected every four months since December 2014 for the SCE Household Spending Survey and October 2015 for the SCE Public Policy Survey as part of the Survey of Consumer Expectations (SCE).

In this post, we highlight the key takeaways from today's data releases regarding the evolution of households' spending and public policy expectations.

Moderate rebound since April in spending growth and in spending growth expectations
Households report a median increase of 1.9 percent in monthly spending in August compared to twelve months earlier, considerably higher than the median April spending growth reading of 1.0 percent, but remaining below August 2019 and December 2019 readings of 2.3 percent and 2.5 percent, respectively. The increase was driven by respondents without a college degree, with spending growth for those with a college degree remaining anemic at only 0.6 percent. Together with the rebound in overall spending, we see an increase in the share of households who reported making a large purchase over the past four months from 51 percent in April to 54 percent in August, although the share remains below its 2019 average level of 61 percent. As in April, we see persistently higher shares of households reporting large purchases on furniture, home appliances, and home repairs (at 13 percent, 15 percent, and 23 percent, respectively), while the share reporting spending on trips and vacations (at 13 percent) remains only 0.1 percentage point above the series low in April 2020 (and 18 percentage points below the series high reached in August 2018).

Median expected year-ahead monthly spending growth also rebounded from 1.5 percent in April to 2.2 percent in August, but remains slightly below its December and year-ago levels of 2.4 percent and 2.5 percent, respectively. The increase was broad-based across age, education, and income groups. Next, we distinguish between spending on essential items (defined as daily living expenses related to what one absolutely needs) and non-essential items (such as hobbies, leisure, vacation, and other items that one does not absolutely need). We see increases from April to August in essential and non-essential median year-ahead spending growth expectations from 3.2 percent to 3.5 percent and 0.2 percent to 1.0 percent, respectively. This last reading of 3.5 percent expected spending growth on essential items is a new series high and may reflect an expected increase in rent and mortgage payments after the anticipated ending of various relief and forbearance programs. Looking at a shorter four-month horizon, households report higher average probabilities of making large purchases on furniture, home appliances, and home repairs, while the average likelihood of spending on trips and vacations, and of buying a vehicle, declined further to new series lows.

Households assign low chance to reductions in government support programs
While finding some modest declines in the average probability of further expansions of government assistance programs, we see persistently low average probabilities assigned to reductions in those programs. The average probability assigned to an increase in housing assistance over the next twelve months reached 37 percent in August, a new series high. Conversely, the average probability of a decrease in housing assistance was 14 percent, representing a series low for the same time frame. The increase was driven by lower-income (below $60,000) respondents without a college degree and might indicate an expectation of further extensions of mortgage forbearance and renter support programs.

Expectations regarding year-ahead changes in welfare and unemployment benefits showed some moderation, with the average likelihood of further expansions falling from 39 percent and 53 percent in April to 32 percent and 31 percent in August, respectively. Despite the decline, expectations of continued program expansion or benefit-level increases remain considerably higher than pre-COVID-19 levels. The average likelihood of a decrease in welfare benefits dropped further in August to 15 percent, a new series low. Yet, respondents report an average probability of 22 percent of a future decrease in unemployment benefits, substantially above the April level of 14 percent.

For many other assistance and social insurance programs, such as Medicare, social security benefits, and federal student aid, we see stable or slightly lower average reported likelihoods of further increases or expansions in these programs, but continued declines in the average probability of a future decline or reduction, all falling below or remaining near the series’ low levels. Finally, with respect to expectations of year-ahead changes in income taxes, we see growth in the likelihood of an increase in the average income tax rate over the next year, rising from 34 percent in April to 37 percent in August, the highest level since 2016. Similarly, the average probability of an increase in the tax rate for the highest income bracket increased from 30 percent in April to 37 percent, a new series high.

For further details, check out the full set of interactive charts on spending and public policy expectations on the Center for Microeconomic Data website.


Kosar_GizemGizem Koşar is an economist in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group.


Pomerantz_rachelRachel Pomerantz is a senior research analyst in the Bank’s Research and Statistics Group.


Vanderklaauw_wilbertWilbert van der Klaauw is a senior vice president in the Bank’s Research and Statistics Group.



How to cite this post:
Gizem Koşar, Rachel Pomerantz, and Wilbert van der Klaauw, “Consumers Expect Modest Increase in Spending Growth and Continued Government Support,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Liberty Street Economics, September 28, 2020, https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2020/09/consumers-expect-modest-increase-in-spending-growth-and-continued-government-support.html.



Disclaimer
The views expressed in this post are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors.
Posted by Blog Author at 11:00:00 AM in Expectations, Fiscal Policy, Household Finance
Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

The comments to this entry are closed.

About the Blog
Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.

The editors are Michael Fleming, Andrew Haughwout, Thomas Klitgaard, and Asani Sarkar, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.

Liberty Street Economics does not publish new posts during the blackout periods surrounding Federal Open Market Committee meetings.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.


Economic Research Tracker

Liberty Street Economics is now available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.


Most Viewed

Last 12 Months
Useful Links
Comment Guidelines
We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:
Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1500 characters.
Please be quick: Comments submitted after COB on Friday will not be published until Monday morning.
Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.
Please be on-topic and patient: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post. We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will not be posted.‎
Disclosure Policy
The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.
Archives