Liberty Street Economics

« | Main

October 15, 2026

Revenue per Worker Is Up. Are Firms Getting a Larger Share?

From the Great Recession until 2019, U.S. labor productivity growth disappointed. Nonfarm-business output per hour grew about 1 percent a year from 2010 to 2019, down from 3 percent in the late 1990s. This slowdown was especially pronounced in manufacturing, and it coincided with a slowdown in the growth of revenue per worker among public firms. However, since 2019, growth has picked up to twice the 2010s rate, around 2 percent. In this post, I use data from firms’ 10-K filings to unpack this recent acceleration. I first show that the acceleration appears in public firms’ revenue per worker, then document how the gains went into profit margins, and finally, what firm characteristics predicted significant profit margin increases. The increase in profit margins is consistent with ongoing declines in the labor share of output.

Firm Productivity, 2019–2025

This piece studies U.S. Compustat firms across both manufacturing and services over 2010–2025, broken into two periods: 2010–2019 and 2019–2025. I drop agriculture, utilities, finance, real estate, and public administration, due to the known challenges of productivity measurement in those industries.

Nonfarm-business output per hour grew 1.0 percent a year from 2010 to 2019 and 2.2 percent a year from 2019 to 2025. In Compustat, I find a similar qualitative growth acceleration. Real revenue per worker—sales deflated by industry output prices, divided by employment—traces the same turn, from 0.7 percent to 2.2 percent a year over the same time periods.

The chart below illustrates this trend, showing that both revenue per worker among public firms and output per hour are accelerating in the recent period. Across all datasets, the labor productivity uptick is real.

Labor Productivity and Firm Revenue Per Worker Accelerated Together in 2019-2025

 Line chart tracking the output per hour (blue) and real revenue per worker (red dashed) of public firms by an index where 2019=100 (vertical axis) from 2010 through 2025 (horizontal axis); both revenue per worker among public firms and output per hour are up in the recent period.
Sources: Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS); Compustat.
Notes: Labor productivity, indexed to 2019 = 100: Chart shows BLS nonfarm-business output per hour and Compustat real revenue per worker.

Higher revenue per worker at the firm level does not indicate who gains from this increased revenue. The additional revenue may go to workers, as firms compete for labor through higher wages, or accrue to firms in profit margins. Firm-level data let me measure how firms’ profit margins changed over time. I explore how profit margins changed between 2019 and 2025 and what firm characteristics predicted markup gains.

Firm Profit Margins

A profit margin is profit divided by sales: the share of each sales dollar the firm keeps after paying its costs. The gross margin subtracts the direct cost of production (cost of goods sold), while the operating margin also subtracts overhead (selling, general, and administrative expense, which in Compustat typically includes R&D). If productivity gains were flowing to firms’ profits, margins should show it. Through the 2010s margins were flat: gross margins grew about 0.4 percent a year from 2010 to 2019, and operating margins were roughly flat. Both then turned up: on average, gross margins went from about 34 percent of sales in 2019 to 37 percent in 2025 (1.3 percent growth per year), and operating margins from 16 percent to 18 percent (2.4 percent growth per year).

Gross and Operating Profit Margins Increased in
2019-2025

 Line chart tracking profit margins by percentage for gross margins (blue, left vertical axis scale) and operating margins (red, right vertical axis scale) from 2010 through 2025 (horizontal axis); through the 2010s margins were flat, but both then turned up: on average, gross margins went from about 34 percent of sales in 2019 to 37 percent in 2025 (1.3 percent growth per year), and operating margins went from 16 percent to 18 percent (2.4 percent growth per year).
Source: Compustat.
Notes: Compustat gross margin (COGS) and operating margin (OPEX), 2010–2025, sales-weighted; gross on the left scale, operating on the right scale.

Which Firms Saw the Largest Gains?

Lastly, I ask whether firms that invest in intangibles (e.g., research and development, or R&D) experienced the largest gains. In earlier work, we showed that while productivity growth in manufacturing slowed in the 2010s, R&D intensity in manufacturing continued to rise. Does R&D intensity predict higher profit margins in the recent era?

Firms that entered the period with higher R&D expenditure relative to sales saw larger subsequent gains: firms with 10 percent more R&D expenditure relative to sales in 2019 saw about 0.7 percent higher operating-markup growth over 2019–2025, and 0.5 percent over 2022–2025. Firms with higher capital intensity did not see such a significant pattern. This pattern is consistent with returns to intangible intensity rather than capital intensity. This suggests a potentially important role for investments in technology and intangibles in driving markups.

Measured productivity has risen since 2019 in both aggregate and firm data, ending more than a decade of slow growth. Part of the gains surfaced with wider profit margins: on a reasonable baseline, the operating margin rose over 2 percent a year from 2019 to 2025. R&D intensity appears to be an important predictor of margin growth for firms, consistent with the rising returns to high-tech firms and firms that have invested in intangibles since COVID. Whether these rising margins are returns to significant investment in intangibles or purely a windfall for firms is a topic to explore in future work.

Portrait of Jeremy Pearce

Jeremy Pearce is a research economist in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Research and Statistics Group. 


How to cite this post:
Jeremy Pearce, “Revenue per Worker Is Up. Are Firms Getting a Larger Share?,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Liberty Street Economics, October 15, 2026, https://doi.org/10.59576/lse.20261015 BibTeX: View |


Disclaimer
The views expressed in this post are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York or the Federal Reserve System. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the author(s).

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Post a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

(Name is required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)

WATCH: Liberty Street Economics 15th Anniversary
About the Blog

Liberty Street Economics features insight and analysis from New York Fed economists working at the intersection of research and policy. Launched in 2011, the blog takes its name from the Bank’s headquarters at 33 Liberty Street in Manhattan’s Financial District.

The editors are Michael Fleming, Thomas Klitgaard, Maxim Pinkovskiy, and Asani Sarkar, all economists in the Bank’s Research Group.

Liberty Street Economics does not publish new posts during the blackout periods surrounding Federal Open Market Committee meetings.

The views expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the position of the New York Fed or the Federal Reserve System.

Economic Research Tracker

Image of NYFED Economic Research Tracker IconLiberty Street Economics is available on the iPhone® and iPad® and can be customized by economic research topic or economist.

Most Read this Year

Comment Guidelines

 

We encourage your comments and queries on our posts and will publish them (below the post) subject to the following guidelines:

Please be brief: Comments are limited to 1,500 characters.

Please be aware: Comments submitted shortly before or during the FOMC blackout may not be published until after the blackout.

Please be relevant: Comments are moderated and will not appear until they have been reviewed to ensure that they are substantive and clearly related to the topic of the post.

Please be respectful: We reserve the right not to post any comment, and will not post comments that are abusive, harassing, obscene, or commercial in nature. No notice will be given regarding whether a submission will or will
not be posted.‎

Comments with links: Please do not include any links in your comment, even if you feel the links will contribute to the discussion. Comments with links will not be posted.

Send Us Feedback

Disclosure Policy

The LSE editors ask authors submitting a post to the blog to confirm that they have no conflicts of interest as defined by the American Economic Association in its Disclosure Policy. If an author has sources of financial support or other interests that could be perceived as influencing the research presented in the post, we disclose that fact in a statement prepared by the author and appended to the author information at the end of the post. If the author has no such interests to disclose, no statement is provided. Note, however, that we do indicate in all cases if a data vendor or other party has a right to review a post.

Archives